Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1237
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIrulappan, Vadivelmurugan-
dc.contributor.authorMali, Komal Vitthalrao-
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Basavanagouda S.-
dc.contributor.authorManjunatha, Hanumappa-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad, Saifulla-
dc.contributor.authorSenthil-Kumar, Muthappa-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-13T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-13T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationApplications in Plant Sciences, 9(8): e11445en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-0450-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11445-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11445-
dc.identifier.urihttp://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1237-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: 21 July 2021en_US
dc.description.abstractPremise: A comprehensive field-based screening protocol is lacking for dry root rot (DRR) disease in chickpea, which is caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (formerly referred to as Rhizoctonia bataticola). Here, we describe a protocol for establishing a sick plot for DRR to enable disease assessment of a large number of chickpea plants during the natural growing season. Methods and Results: We used a chickpea plot with >30% DRR incidence, and enriched the inoculum by cultivating highly susceptible chickpea plant genotypes and incorporating infected plant material into the soil. The chickpea plants were then subjected to infection in developed sick plots with various levels of soil moisture under natural field conditions. Conclusions: Our protocol provides a robust way to impose M. phaseolina infection on chickpea plants under natural field conditions and to investigate plant responses to the infection at morphological, physiological, and molecular levels. This method can also be used to screen for other soil‐borne diseases in a variety of plants.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR) core funding and by research fellowships to V.I. (DBT‐JRF/DBT/2015/NIPGR/430) and K.V.M. (CSIR‐ JRF/09/803(0148)/2018‐EMR‐1). The authors thank Mr. Rahim Tarafdar and Mr. Shankar Badaik (NIPGR) for field assistance; the DBT eLibrary Consortium for access to e‐resources; the NIPGR Plant Growth Facility for providing growth space and maintenance; and Dr. Mahesh Patil, Ms. Aanchal Choudhary, and Mr. Aswin Chilakala (NIPGR) for internally reviewing the text and raw data.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.subjectCicer arietinumen_US
dc.subjectcombined stressen_US
dc.subjectdry root roten_US
dc.subjectMacrophomina phaseolinaen_US
dc.subjectRhizoctonia bataticolaen_US
dc.subjectsick plot techniqueen_US
dc.titleA sick plot-based protocol for dry root rot disease assessment in field-grown chickpea plantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Senthil-Kumar M_2021_6.pdf4.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.