Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1408
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra, Bhanu-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Pawan-
dc.contributor.authorBisht, Naveen C.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-10T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationPlant, Cell & Environment, 46(10): 2964-2984en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-3040-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14462-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pce.14462-
dc.identifier.urihttp://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1408-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: 07 October 2022en_US
dc.description.abstractSpecialized metabolites are a structurally diverse group of naturally occurring compounds that facilitate plant-environment interactions. Their synthesis and maintenance in plants is overall a resource-demanding process that occurs at the expense of growth and reproduction and typically incurs several costs. Evidence emerging on different specialized compounds suggests that they serve multiple auxiliary functions to influence and moderate primary metabolism in plants. These new functionalities enable them to mediate trade-offs from defenses to growth and also to offset their production and maintenance costs in plants. Recent research on glucosinolates (GSLs), which are specialized metabolites of Brassicales, demonstrates their emerging multifunctionalities to fine-tune plant growth and development under variable environments. Herein, we present findings from the septennium on individual GSLs and their catabolites (GHPs) per se, that work as mobile signals within plants to mediate precise regulations of their primary physiological functions. Both GSLs and GHPs calibrate growth-defense trade-off interactions either synergistically or directly when they function as storage compounds, abiotic stress alleviators, and one-to-one regulators of growth pathways in plants. We finally summarize the overall lessons learned from GSLs and GHPs as a model and raise the most pressing questions to address the molecular-genetic intricacies of specialized metabolite-based trade-offs in plants.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work is supported by Newton-Bhabha Fund (BT/UK/PORI/03/AKP/2018-19) and DBT-SRNB award (BT/HRD-NBA-NWB/38/2019-20(10)) to NCB. BM and PK sincerely acknowledge financial assistance from CSIR and NIPGR fellowships, respectively. We are thankful to Prof. Deepak Pental, CGMCP, New Delhi for his critical reading and insightful comments on the manuscript. The authors acknowledge the work of all the research groups who have contributed to the mechanisms of emerging multifunctionalities in specialized GSLs and GHPs. The authors are thankful to the reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.subjectAliphatic and indolic glucosinolatesen_US
dc.subjectGlucosinolate as signalsen_US
dc.subjectGlucosinolate turnoveren_US
dc.subjectGlucosinolates and hydrolysis productsen_US
dc.subjectGrowth-defense trade-offsen_US
dc.subjectPlant growth and developmenten_US
dc.subjectPlant secondary metabolitesen_US
dc.subjectPrimary metabolismen_US
dc.subjectSpecialized compoundsen_US
dc.titleDefense versus growth trade-offs: insights from glucosinolates and their catabolitesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bisht NC_2023_3.pdf
  Restricted Access
4.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.