Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1510
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMann, Avni-
dc.contributor.authorKumari, Juhi-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Roshan-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Pawan-
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Akshay K.-
dc.contributor.authorPental, Deepak-
dc.contributor.authorBisht, Naveen C.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T05:56:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-14T05:56:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationPlant Biotechnology Journal, 21(11): 2182-2195en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-7652-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14121-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.14121-
dc.identifier.urihttp://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1510-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: 26 June 2023en_US
dc.description.abstractGlucosinolate content in the two major oilseed Brassica crops-rapeseed and mustard has been reduced to the globally accepted Canola quality level (<30 μmoles/g of seed dry weight, DW), making the protein-rich seed meal useful as animal feed. However, the overall lower glucosinolate content in seeds as well as in the other parts of such plants renders them vulnerable to biotic challenges. We report CRISPR/Cas9-based editing of glucosinolate transporter (GTR) family genes in mustard (Brassica juncea) to develop ideal lines with the desired low seed glucosinolate content (SGC) while maintaining high glucosinolate levels in the other plant parts for uncompromised plant defence. Use of three gRNAs provided highly efficient and precise editing of four BjuGTR1 and six BjuGTR2 homologues leading to a reduction of SGC from 146.09 μmoles/g DW to as low as 6.21 μmoles/g DW. Detailed analysis of the GTR-edited lines showed higher accumulation and distributional changes of glucosinolates in the foliar parts. However, the changes did not affect the plant defence and yield parameters. When tested against the pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and generalist pest Spodoptera litura, the GTR-edited lines displayed a defence response at par or better than that of the wild-type line. The GTR-edited lines were equivalent to the wild-type line for various seed yield and seed quality traits. Our results demonstrate that simultaneous editing of multiple GTR1 and GTR2 homologues in mustard can provide the desired low-seed, high-leaf glucosinolate lines with an uncompromised defence and yield.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the BT/HRD-NBA-NWB/38/2019-20(10) grant of DBT (India) to N.C.B. Financial supports from CSIR (India) to A.M., UGC (India) to J.K., DBT (India) to R.K., and NIPGR Short-term fellowship to P.K. are acknowledged. Central facilities of DBT-NIPGR and technical help from Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. Haribhagwan Maurya, and field staff during the study are greatly acknowledged.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.subjectBrassica oilseedsen_US
dc.subjectCRISPR/Cas9en_US
dc.subjectCanola qualityen_US
dc.subjectgene editingen_US
dc.subjectglucosinolate transportersen_US
dc.subjectplant defenceen_US
dc.titleTargeted editing of multiple homologues of GTR1 and GTR2 genes provides the ideal low-seed, high-leaf glucosinolate oilseed mustard with uncompromised defence and yielden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bisht NC_2023_2.pdf2.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.