Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1544
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanjan, Shubhashish-
dc.contributor.authorMirchandani, Rishabh-
dc.contributor.authorSenthil-Kumar, Muthappa-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T09:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-15T09:44:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationPlant Physiology Reports, (In Press)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2662-2548-
dc.identifier.issn2662-253X-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-023-00753-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40502-023-00753-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1544-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: 12 October 2023en_US
dc.description.abstractMacrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid is an emerging pathogen that causes diseases like dry root rot and charcoal rot in more than 100 plant families. Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and heat exacerbate this fungal effect and predispose crops to pathogen attacks. Importantly, these combined stresses lead to significant crop yield losses under field conditions. In this, we review the interaction between the devastating pathogen M. phaseolina and several abiotic stresses that are more likely to occur in scenarios of climate change. Drought, heat, and salinity are the major stresses that interact with M. phaseolina in the field. We discuss several field studies, unique physiological and molecular responses, and their mechanisms of control in response to combined stress. The net effect of these interactions depends on a multitude of factors; thus, these interactions modify the impact of biotic stresses on plants by altering their susceptibility. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of what is currently known about M. phaseolina and abiotic stress interactions, as well as several other edaphic factors that interact with plants. We briefly discuss the role of drought, salinity, heat stress, and edaphic factors (such as pH, N, P, K, etc.) that influence pathogen infection in plants. Furthermore, we discuss possible management strategies to combat crop loss due to combined stress. Thus, we suggest the future aspect of combined stress breeding, along with the use of multi-omics techniques and genome editing approaches, to develop cultivars that exhibit stability in a combined stress environment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCombined stress projects at the MS-K lab are supported by the National Institute of Plant Genome Research core funding and partly by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India (No. BT/Ag/Network/Chickpea/2019–20), under the mission program on “Characterization of genetic resources”. Council of Scientifc and Industrial Research (CSIR) junior research fellowship [CSIR File no. – 09/0803(13718)/2022-EMR-I] to S.R. and [CSIR File no. – 09/803(0177)/2020-EMR-I] to R.M are also acknowledged.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Publishing AGen_US
dc.subjectCombined stressen_US
dc.subjectM. Phaseolinaen_US
dc.subjectDroughten_US
dc.subjectHeaten_US
dc.subjectSalinityen_US
dc.subjectLegumesen_US
dc.titleAbiotic stress impact on the interaction between Macrophomina phaseolina and crop plantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Senthil-Kumar M_2023_5.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.