Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/460
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShekhar, Shubhendu-
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Divya-
dc.contributor.authorBuragohain, Alak Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Subhra-
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Niranjan-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-28T11:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-28T11:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationFood Chemistry, 173: 957-965en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-8146-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.16.0.77:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/460-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: 19 September 2014en_US
dc.description.abstractSweet potato ranks as the world's seventh most important food crop, and has major contribution to energy and phytochemical source of nutrition. To unravel the molecular basis for differential nutrient availability, and to exploit the natural genetic variation(s) of sweet potato, a series of physiochemical and proteomics experiment was conducted using two contrasting cultivars, an orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) and a white-fleshed sweet potato (WFSP). Phytochemical screening revealed high percentage of carbohydrate, reducing sugar and phenolics in WFSP, whereas OFSP showed increased levels of total protein, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and carotenoids. The rate of starch and cellulose degradation was found to be less in OFSP during storage, indicating tight regulation of gene(s) responsible for starch-degradation. Comparative proteomics displayed a cultivar-dependent expression of proteins along with evolutionarily conserved proteins. These results suggest that cultivar-specific expression of proteins and/or their interacting partners might play a crucial role for nutrient acquisition in sweet potato.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grants (BT/PR3123/16//250) from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India. We kindly acknowledge the University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India for providing predoctoral fellowship to D.M. We also thank CTCRI, India for providing planting materials of sweet potato. We thank Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Tezpur University, for extending their facilities. Assistance of Mr. Jasbeer Singh for illustrations and graphical representations, and Mr. Shankar Acharya and Mr. C. Ravishankar during field management is highly acknowledged.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.subjectAnthocyaninsen_US
dc.subjectFlavonoidsen_US
dc.subjectNutritional diversityen_US
dc.subjectPhenolicsen_US
dc.subjectPhytochemicalsen_US
dc.subjectProteome profilingen_US
dc.subjectStorage stressen_US
dc.subjectTranscript abundanceen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of phytochemicals and nutrient availability in two contrasting cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814614017014en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.172en_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chakraborty N_2014_4.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.