Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://223.31.159.10:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/680
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMur, Luis A.J.-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorKumari, Aprajita-
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Alok Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Kapuganti Jagadis-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-14T11:31:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-14T11:31:33Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAnn. Bot., 119(5): 703-709en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8290-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.16.0.77:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/680-
dc.descriptionAccepted date: June 8, 2016en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Plants require nitrogen (N) for growth, development and defence against abiotic and biotic stresses. The extensive use of artificial N fertilizers has played an important role in the Green Revolution. N assimilation can involve a reductase series (NO–3→ NO–2 → NH+4) followed by transamination to form amino acids. Given its widespread use, the agricultural impact of N nutrition on disease development has been extensively examined. Scope: When a pathogen first comes into contact with a host, it is usually nutrient starved such that rapid assimilation of host nutrients is essential for successful pathogenesis. Equally, the host may reallocate its nutrients to defence responses or away from the site of attempted infection. Exogenous application of N fertilizer can, therefore, shift the balance in favour of the host or pathogen. In line with this, increasing N has been reported either to increase or to decrease plant resistance to pathogens, which reflects differences in the infection strategies of discrete pathogens. Beyond considering only N content, the use of NO-3 or NH+4 fertilizers affects the outcome of plant–pathogen interactions. NO-3 feeding augments hypersensitive response- (HR) mediated resistance, while ammonium nutrition can compromise defence. Metabolically, NO–3 enhances production of polyamines such as spermine and spermidine, which are established defence signals, with NH+4 nutrition leading to increased γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels which may be a nutrient source for the pathogen. Within the defensive N economy, the roles of nitric oxide must also be considered. This is mostly generated from NO–2 by nitrate reductase and is elicited by both pathogen-associated microbial patterns and gene-for-gene-mediated defences. Nitric oxide (NO) production and associated defences are therefore NO-3 dependent and are compromised by NH+4. Conclusion:This review demonstrates how N content and form plays an essential role in defensive primary and secondary metabolism and NO-mediated events.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is currently being supported by a DST-UKIERI thematic partnership award to K.J.G. and L.A.J.M. K.J.G. is currently supported by a Ramalingaswami Fellowship and Innovate Young Biotechnology Award (IYBA) by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. We thank Aakanksha Wany for critical reading of the manuscript, and also thank the handling editor for providing valuable suggestions for improvement of this manuscript.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectNitric oxideen_US
dc.subjectnitrateen_US
dc.subjectammoniumen_US
dc.subjectPseudomonasen_US
dc.subjectpolyaminesen_US
dc.subjectnitrate reductaseen_US
dc.subjectplant defenceen_US
dc.titleMoving nitrogen to the centre of plant defence against pathogensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/09/02/aob.mcw179.fullen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aob/mcw179en_US
Appears in Collections:Institutional Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gupta KJ_2016_5.pdf
  Restricted Access
511.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IR@NIPGR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.